PART Ⅰ THE PRODUCTION AND INTERPRETATION OF LEGAL EVIDENCE: FOUR APPROACHES

A Pure Probabilistic Deduction

1. Richard O.Lempert （1977）, ‘Modeling Relevance’, Michigan Law Review, 75 （5-6）, April-May, 1021-57

2. Ronald J.Allen （1986）, ‘A Reconceptualization of Civil Trials’, Boston University Law Review, 66, 401-37

B Omission Models

3. Paul Milgrom and John Roberts （1986）, ‘Relying on the Information of Interested Parties’, RAND Journal of Economics, 17 （1）, Spring, 18-32

C Endogenous Cost Evidence

4. Chris William Sanchirico （2001）, ‘Relying on the Information of Interested - and Potentially Dishonest - Parties’, American Law and Economics Review, 3 （2）, May, 320-57

D Correlated Private Information

5. Chris William Sanchirico （2000）, ‘Games, Information, and Evidence Production: With Application to English Legal History’, American Law and Economics Review, 2 （2）, Fall, 342-80

PART Ⅱ TRUTH FINDING VERSUS PRIMARY ACTIVITY INCENTIVE SETTING

6. Richard A.Posner （1973）, excerpts from ‘An Economic Approach to Legal Procedure and Judicial Administration’, Journal of Legal Studies, Ⅱ （2）, June, Introduction and Parts Ⅰ, Ⅱ and Ⅲ, 399-417

7. Louis Kaplow and Steven Shavell （1996）, ‘Accuracy in the Assessment of Damages’, Journal of Law and Economics, ⅩⅩⅩⅨ （1）, April, 191-210

8. Kathryn E.Spier （1994）, ‘Settlement Bargaining and the Design of Damage Awards’, Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 10 （1）, April, 84-95

PART Ⅲ ADVERSARIAL PROCESS VERSUS INQUISITORIAL PROCESS

A Balance or Bias in Adversarial Competition

9. Luke M.Froeb and Bruce H.Kobayashi （1996）, ‘Naive, Biased, yet Bayesian； Can Juries Interpret Selectively Produced Evidence?’, Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 12 （1）, April, 257-76

10.Andrew F. Daughety and Jennifer F.Reinganum （2000）, ‘On the Economics of Trials: Adversarial Process, Evidence, and Equilibrium Bias’, Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 16 （2）, October, 365-94

B Explicit Comparison

11.Hyun Song Shin （1998）, ‘Adversarial and Inquisitorial Procedures in Arbitration’, RAND Journal of Economics, 29 （2）, Summer, 378-405

12.Luke M.Froeb and Bruce H.Kobayashi （2001）, ‘Evidence Production in Adversarial vs.Inquisitorial Regimes’, Economics Letters, 70, 267-72

13.Francesco Parisi （2002）, ‘Rent-seeking through Litigation: Adversarial and Inquisitorial Systems Compared’, International Review of Law and Economics, 22, 193-216

PART Ⅳ SPECIFIC RULES OF EVIDENCE AND PROCEDURE

A Proof Burdens

14.David Kaye （1982）, ‘The Limits of the Preponderance of the Evidence Standard: Justifiably Naked Statistical Evidence and Multiple Causation’, American Bar Foundation Research Journal, 7 （2）, Spring, 487-516

15.Chris William Sanchirico （1997）, ‘The Burden of Proof in Civil Litigation: A Simple Model of Mechanism Design’, International Review of Law and Economics, 17, 431-47

16.Bruce L.Hay and Kathryn E.Spier （1997）, ‘Burdens of Proof in Civil Litigation: An Economic Perspective’, Journal of Legal Studies, ⅩⅩⅥ （2）, June, 413-31

B Character Evidence

17. Chris William Sanchirico （2001）, excerpts from ‘Character Evidence and the Object of Trial’, Columbia Law Review, 101 （6）, October, Introduction, Parts Ⅱ, Ⅲ and Ⅳ, 1227-39, 1259-81

C Hearsay

18. Richard D.Friedman （1992）, excerpts from ‘Toward a Partial Economic, Game-Theoretic Analysis of Hearsay’, Minnesota Law Review, 76, Parts Ⅰ-Ⅱ and Part Ⅴ, 723-9,750-91

D Privilege

19. Stephen McG.Bundy and Einer Richard Elhauge （1991）, excerpts from ‘Do Lawyers Improve the Adversary System? A General Theory of Litigation Advice and Its Regulation’, California Law Review, 79, Parts Ⅰ, Ⅱ and VB, 313-20, 335-61, 401-20

E Perjury, Obstruction of Justice and Similar Sanctions: Optimal Level

20. Steven Shavell （1989）, ‘Optimal Sanctions and the Incentive to Provide Evidence to Legal Tribunals’, International Review of Law and Economics, 9, 3-11

21. Chris William Sanchirico （2004）, excerpts from ‘Evidence Tampering’, Duke Law Journal, 53 （4）, February, Introduction, Part Ⅲ and Appendix, 1215-29, 1286-303, 1318-36

F Perjury, Obstruction of Justice and Similar Sanctions: Optimal Structure

22. Chris William Sanchirico （2004）, excerpt from ‘Evidence Tampering’, Duke Law Journal, 53, Part Ⅳ, 1303-17

Name Index